Comparison Of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured By Non-Contact (Air–Puff) Tonometer Compared With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background: Measurement of intraocular pressure is one the most important examination procedures in ophthalmic clinics, IOP an parameter diagnosis glaucoma. There are numerous types tonometers available, it to evaluate differences readings between different tonometers. Goldmann Applanation Tonometers and non-contact Air-Puff largely available clinics.Aim: The purpose this study difference measurements taken by a GAT those Air Puff Tonometer observe reliability be screening tool.Material Methods: This was performed on 200 eyes from 100 participants (including: Relatives patients, medical students, nurses patients complaining errors refraction). attending outpatient clinic. visual acuity, Refraction, fundus examination, corneal thickness were assessed for each participant; Also, patient’s measured using both tonometry, two methods calculated.Result: mean 14.48±2.29 mmHg, while that tonometer 16.34±2.3 mmHg. measurement 1.855 obtained higher than highly statistically significant.Conclusion: non-contact, air puff, produces which similar & consistent gold standard GAT. Our indicated there good consistency
منابع مشابه
Intraocular pressure measurement: Goldmann Applanation Tonometer vs non contact airpuff tonometer.
BACKGROUND An accurate assessment of Intraocular pressure (IOP) is vital in establishing diagnosis of Glaucoma and decision making regarding various treatment modalities available. The purpose of this study is to compare Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) with Air puff tonometer. METHODS Cross-sectional comparative study conducted. 73 eyes from 73 patients were included in this study and in...
متن کاملComparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
OBJECTIVE WE AIMED TO COMPARE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE (IOP) MEASUREMENTS VIA THREE DIFFERENT TONOMETERS: the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen(®) XL (TPXL), and a non-contact airpuff tonometer (NCT). METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of 200 eyes from 200 patients. Right eyes of all patients were included in this study. IOP was measured via GAT, NCT, and TPXL by three phys...
متن کاملComparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects
BACKGROUND To compare the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) among the three different non-contact tonometers (NCT) and the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) for non-glaucomatous subjects. METHODS In 52 eyes of 52 non-glaucomatous subjects, IOP was measured sequentially with the Canon TX-20P, the Nidek NT-530P, the Topcon CT-1P, and the GAT at the same time. We evaluated the IOP-mea...
متن کاملComparison of IOPen rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer at different IOP levels.
AIM To compare the accuracy of IOPen rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in individuals with low, normal and high intraocular pressure (IOP) and to evaluate the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements. METHODS This cross-sectional study consisted of 159 participants. IOP of one eye of each subject was measured consecutively with IOPen and GAT. The...
متن کاملComparison of Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and Pulsatile Ocular Blood Flow Analyser
BACKGROUND Intraocular pressure (IOP) is the major known risk factor in glaucoma and the primer mover of the functional damage in glaucomatous patients but it is not a unique determinant of glaucomatous damage. Clinical assessment of glaucoma patients may not be a true reflection of overall IOP control. Evaluation of the effect of glaucoma medication is restricted by measurement of IOP as a dyn...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Benha Medical Journal
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2357-0016', '1110-208X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2021.17077.1062